<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158</id><updated>2011-12-14T15:42:37.899-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Political Economy</title><subtitle type='html'>This is a CU Colorado Springs student blog for the following courses: Economic Freedom, and Power &amp;amp; Prosperity.</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default?start-index=101&amp;max-results=100'/><author><name>Larry Eubanks</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15566964700226634137</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>388</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-818112530566264297</id><published>2011-12-13T22:40:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2011-12-14T15:37:30.677-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Christian Libertarianism</title><summary type='text'>This nation’s legislative branch has a tendency to infringeupon our rights to liberty. According to an article by Deirdre McCloskey, “Abig or small entrepreneur, encouraged by dignity and enabled by liberty,alertly notices an opportunity and takes it. (p. 6)” This is the mechanism bywhich we prosper.The dignity of the entrepreneur is being threatened.Consider Occupy Wall Street. Among many vague </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/818112530566264297/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=818112530566264297' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/818112530566264297'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/818112530566264297'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2011/12/christian-libertarianism.html' title='Christian Libertarianism'/><author><name>abbi33</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14250525037106138812</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-2542585452595661158</id><published>2011-12-11T04:06:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2011-12-11T04:07:53.672-07:00</updated><title type='text'>That which waits ahead...</title><summary type='text'>This is an unconventional blog, but I am hoping to make it relevant.  The article I read is all about how companies are less willing to hire new graduates because of the lack of new creative ideas and because they are less tolerant of the missteps that new graduates are bound to make.  The article suggests that employers adjust and invest in training of these new graduates rather than turning </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/11/jobs/helping-graduates-find-their-footing-in-the-workplace.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business' title='That which waits ahead...'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/2542585452595661158/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=2542585452595661158' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/2542585452595661158'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/2542585452595661158'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2011/12/that-which-waits-ahead.html' title='That which waits ahead...'/><author><name>Lauren Peterson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07053582114546056672</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-4947922097843479126</id><published>2011-11-30T23:38:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2011-11-30T23:40:33.745-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Slow Day for News...</title><summary type='text'>Today I stumbled across the issue of the recent lift on the ban that prevented the use of federal funds to inspect facilities that slaughter horses.  It turns out to be an interesting example of the effects of interventionism.  In 2006, the ban was placed and ended horse slaughter in the United States.  All meat that crosses state lines must be inspected by the USDA.  Because this inspection </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.freep.com/article/20111130/NEWS07/111130052/Horses-could-soon-slaughtered-meat-U-S-' title='Slow Day for News...'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/4947922097843479126/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=4947922097843479126' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/4947922097843479126'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/4947922097843479126'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2011/11/slow-day-for-news.html' title='Slow Day for News...'/><author><name>Sarah Ward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02413860162221142931</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-eifXh3_tuSk/TtchMdlhUVI/AAAAAAAAAAg/PBez_0PYJLU/s72-c/FunnyHorse1.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-6267825105573693720</id><published>2011-11-30T20:09:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2011-11-30T20:36:09.245-07:00</updated><title type='text'>On Healthcare</title><summary type='text'>To begin, it might be worthwhile for readers to check out the article that inspired my thoughts this time around (it should be linked above, but just in case: http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/mi/201111290.asp).What bothers me the most about the abuse that health care professionals are able to practice is that they are only able to carry it out because of the trust they receive from society and the </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/mi/201111290.asp' title='On Healthcare'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/6267825105573693720/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=6267825105573693720' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6267825105573693720'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6267825105573693720'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2011/11/on-healthcare.html' title='On Healthcare'/><author><name>Scott Wermuth</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09100233839829133162</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-7107855586177991244</id><published>2011-11-26T23:31:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2011-11-26T23:34:11.108-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Economics: Brain Drain, Brain Gain and Brain Circulation</title><summary type='text'>
For economic growth a company or a country as whole need human capital. More importantly, skilled workers are engines of the innovation that allows a company or a country to stay competitive; not only nationally but also internationally. A couple days ago I was reading news on the internet and I came across an interesting topic in one of UK newspapers Telegraph. The story was by Rebecca Smith “</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/7107855586177991244/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=7107855586177991244' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7107855586177991244'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7107855586177991244'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2011/11/economics-brain-drain-brain-gain-and.html' title='Economics: Brain Drain, Brain Gain and Brain Circulation'/><author><name>PKajen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07180034154101699856</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-4364490695615880321</id><published>2011-11-22T15:59:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2011-11-22T16:02:12.190-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Who is to save Europe, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, China or the US?</title><summary type='text'>

As the world continue going global whatever affects one
country will certainly affect neighboring countries or even across the
continents. This is true nowadays when you look at both political and economic
spectrums. Building on ideas “What is the role of government in people’s life” I
think that we as people across the globe gave too much power to governments. Be
in capitalist or socialist (</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/4364490695615880321/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=4364490695615880321' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/4364490695615880321'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/4364490695615880321'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2011/11/who-is-to-save-europe-german-chancellor.html' title='Who is to save Europe, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, China or the US?'/><author><name>PKajen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07180034154101699856</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-6286075114609668322</id><published>2011-11-16T21:16:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2011-11-16T22:20:17.048-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Best Party</title><summary type='text'>If the ideal government is one which is thoroughly preventedfrom using its force and coercion to accomplish anything other than protectingour property rights, what would this look like? Surely this government would lookvastly different from the one we are currently subjected to. Due to a personalview that anyone in power should not be in power because they want to be in powerand thereby gain the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/6286075114609668322/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=6286075114609668322' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6286075114609668322'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6286075114609668322'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2011/11/best-party.html' title='The Best Party'/><author><name>abbi33</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14250525037106138812</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-7047762443090680702</id><published>2011-11-08T17:55:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-11-08T17:55:26.245-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>




Can a Tsunami Hit Politics not
Economics in any Given Country? 

Looking at what is happening
around the world; one would argue that politics and economics are indeed intertwined.
Therefore, when there is a fire in economy, politics will feel the heat. This
may be true when you observe what is going in Eurozone. Greece, one of the European
members was to be bailed out by Euro bank because it</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/7047762443090680702/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=7047762443090680702' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7047762443090680702'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7047762443090680702'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2011/11/can-tsunami-hit-politics-noteconomics.html' title=''/><author><name>PKajen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07180034154101699856</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-6527738565947896426</id><published>2011-11-06T12:25:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2011-11-06T12:27:23.237-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Oh, Ayn Rand...</title><summary type='text'>So mostly this article has nothing to do with economics, but there is a small part that I have some problems with and thought I would dish them out here.  So the article is about Ayn Rand's Objectivism (by the way my 'i' key is not workng so well, it is highly probable I will miss a couple), and guiding your life by such values.  Apparently she wrote a book detailing out what she means by each of</summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=objectivism_intro' title='Oh, Ayn Rand...'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/6527738565947896426/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=6527738565947896426' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6527738565947896426'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6527738565947896426'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2011/11/oh-ayn-rand.html' title='Oh, Ayn Rand...'/><author><name>Lauren Peterson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07053582114546056672</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-4161449413398130420</id><published>2011-11-05T22:56:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2011-11-05T23:23:09.387-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Guy Fawkes</title><summary type='text'>"Remember, remember, the fifth of November, the gunpowder treason and plot."Today is the four-hundred and sixth anniversary of a failed attempt by English Catholics to destroy the English Parliament. Made popular in recent years by the movie "V for Vendetta", today is heralded as a day of remembrance for "fairness, justice, and freedom" as "more than words, but perspectives."The problem that I </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/4161449413398130420/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=4161449413398130420' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/4161449413398130420'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/4161449413398130420'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2011/11/guy-fawkes.html' title='Guy Fawkes'/><author><name>Scott Wermuth</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09100233839829133162</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-1771433002965347407</id><published>2011-11-05T13:56:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2011-11-05T14:00:41.398-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Perhaps you should occupy your free time instead...</title><summary type='text'>I’m surprised to find, in a blog dedicated to one of the more politically charged classes on campus, that no one yet has mentioned Occupy Wall Street.  Media coverage of this movement is spreading as quickly as the gathering of demonstrators themselves.  Everyone from Fox News, the BBC, National Public Radio, and all those in between have has put out extensive new coverage on the protests since </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/1771433002965347407/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=1771433002965347407' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1771433002965347407'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1771433002965347407'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2011/11/perhaps-you-should-occupy-your-free.html' title='Perhaps you should occupy your free time instead...'/><author><name>Maxwell Kantor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03827829655254721960</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-7328071954524609953</id><published>2011-10-31T17:50:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2011-10-31T17:55:35.002-06:00</updated><title type='text'>The Latest Teen Craze and Economic Freedom</title><summary type='text'>The Hunger Games series has teen cult-like following similar to that of Twilight and Harry Potter. Naturally, I absolutely had to read it. After such a popular following in the books, the first of three movies comes out in March. Unfortunately, unlike both Harry Potter and Twilight, Robert Pattinson will not be starring. I finished the last of the three books a few weeks ago and I noticed a </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.thehungergames.co.uk/' title='The Latest Teen Craze and Economic Freedom'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/7328071954524609953/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=7328071954524609953' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7328071954524609953'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7328071954524609953'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2011/10/latest-teen-craze-and-economic-freedom.html' title='The Latest Teen Craze and Economic Freedom'/><author><name>Sarah Ward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02413860162221142931</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-8892262140835948126</id><published>2011-10-08T01:37:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2011-10-26T17:37:44.550-06:00</updated><title type='text'>The Noble Highwayman</title><summary type='text'>"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its people may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end."-C.S. LewisThis particular quote draws our attention to </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/8892262140835948126/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=8892262140835948126' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/8892262140835948126'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/8892262140835948126'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2011/10/noble-highwayman.html' title='The Noble Highwayman'/><author><name>abbi33</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14250525037106138812</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-9223344453611018193</id><published>2011-10-06T11:01:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2011-10-06T11:04:15.929-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Issue Avoided.</title><summary type='text'>I stumbled upon this article while procrastinating of facebook a couple of weeks ago, and at first didn’t think of it for a blog until I read the comments. The article is about a girl who wore a shirt that said ‘Marriage is so Gay’ on it to her public school one day and was forced to change. She went to the news and explained she just wanted to show her support for the gay community. The ACLU got</summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.kktv.com/news/headlines/School_Objects_to_Teens_Shirt_106664378.html?storySection=comments#commentAnchor' title='Issue Avoided.'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/9223344453611018193/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=9223344453611018193' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/9223344453611018193'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/9223344453611018193'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2011/10/i-stumbled-upon-this-article-while.html' title='Issue Avoided.'/><author><name>Lauren Peterson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07053582114546056672</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-1359244084972147712</id><published>2011-09-30T19:44:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2011-09-30T19:46:25.694-06:00</updated><title type='text'>A "Thrilling" Analysis of Conrad Murray's Trial</title><summary type='text'>Dr. Conrad Murray, charged with involuntary manslaughter and gross negligence, is on trial for the death of famed pop star Michael Jackson (basic information available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-15058723).  Dr. Murray, who was Jackson’s personal attending physician at the time of his death, is implicated in having given Jackson an overdose of a sedative, similar to that used </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/1359244084972147712/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=1359244084972147712' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1359244084972147712'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1359244084972147712'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2011/09/thrilling-analysis-of-conrad-murrays.html' title='A &quot;Thrilling&quot; Analysis of Conrad Murray&apos;s Trial'/><author><name>Maxwell Kantor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03827829655254721960</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-8120533062619805651</id><published>2011-09-30T16:30:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2011-09-30T17:07:31.075-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Proposition 103: Temporary Tax Increase for Public Education</title><summary type='text'>This morning I found a blue book for Proposition 103 on my dining room table. I don't know how it got there, but I'm glad it did. Proposition 103 asks Colorado voters to take on a small increase in both state income and sales taxes for a five year period. For a single person with an annual income of $35,000 dollars a year, in other words, me after I graduate (hopefully) this comes to about $110 </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/8120533062619805651/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=8120533062619805651' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/8120533062619805651'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/8120533062619805651'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2011/09/proposition-103-temporary-tax-increase.html' title='Proposition 103: Temporary Tax Increase for Public Education'/><author><name>Scott Wermuth</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09100233839829133162</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-6317852054669595161</id><published>2011-09-30T01:41:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2011-10-06T13:08:21.439-06:00</updated><title type='text'>The Advantages of Inequality</title><summary type='text'>The Goodwill is a nonprofit organization that provides rehabilitation for and hires disabled people.  They have created a very unique niche in the nonprofit sector by creating a sustainable way to help the disabled.  They collect used items and sell them, which not only creates jobs, but raises funds for rehabilitation costs.Disabled people are a very unique, but valuable workforce.  They are a </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/6317852054669595161/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=6317852054669595161' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6317852054669595161'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6317852054669595161'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2011/09/advantages-of-inequality.html' title='The Advantages of Inequality'/><author><name>Sarah Ward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02413860162221142931</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-206382883739304901</id><published>2010-12-20T20:52:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2010-12-20T22:12:10.625-07:00</updated><title type='text'>the difference in taking and borrowing</title><summary type='text'>A lot of people have associated the current and former administrations approach to dealing with failing industries with communism; or complain about the socialist aspect as if it is anything new.  Loaning General Motors $50 billion on behalf of the American people is intrusive and evokes feelings of being robbed by the politicians that approved such measures.  The people in Detroit and other </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/206382883739304901/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=206382883739304901' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/206382883739304901'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/206382883739304901'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/12/difference-in-taking-and-borrowing.html' title='the difference in taking and borrowing'/><author><name>Jamil Santos</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-7544621908152210791</id><published>2010-12-14T04:27:00.007-07:00</published><updated>2010-12-14T04:42:28.516-07:00</updated><title type='text'>what is a small business, and why lowering taxes on the top bracket largely benefits wage earners, not "small business" owners</title><summary type='text'>The government only taxes income, after business expenses deducted, over the $200,000/$250,000 for couples, in the top tax rate.  This means the gross income minus all business expenses, including labor.  If the government allowed the Bush tax cuts to expire for the top tax bracket, only 2% of tax payers who reported incomes from a business would see an increase in their taxes.  This means only </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/7544621908152210791/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=7544621908152210791' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7544621908152210791'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7544621908152210791'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/12/what-is-small-business-and-why-lowering.html' title='what is a small business, and why lowering taxes on the top bracket largely benefits wage earners, not &quot;small business&quot; owners'/><author><name>Jamil Santos</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-7263496686066475054</id><published>2010-12-01T23:06:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-12-01T23:09:53.492-07:00</updated><title type='text'>EU or EW?</title><summary type='text'>Germany cannot be blamed for not wanting to bail out all of Europe.  They had a stable and strong currency, and now the Euro may not be so stable and they have to bail other countries within the European Union out.  While we cannot know for sure what would have happened if Germany did not change to the Euro, their frustration is certainly warranted.  While I was reading the article all I could </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/01/AR2010120106634.html' title='EU or EW?'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/7263496686066475054/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=7263496686066475054' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7263496686066475054'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7263496686066475054'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/12/eu-or-ew.html' title='EU or EW?'/><author><name>Lauren Peterson</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-7025452903417842348</id><published>2010-12-01T11:35:00.003-07:00</published><updated>2010-12-01T12:56:08.773-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Unemployment</title><summary type='text'>There are about 2 million Americans who will be losing their unemployment checks at the end of December once the current benefits are no longer in place. Right now, jobless workers are receiving 99 weeks of unemployment benefits, but this would be reduced back down to 26 weeks. The National Employment Law Project (NELP) estimates that it would cost approximately $56 billion to extend these </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/7025452903417842348/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=7025452903417842348' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7025452903417842348'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7025452903417842348'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/12/unemployment.html' title='Unemployment'/><author><name>jamie_baby89</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-1293548170795114785</id><published>2010-11-30T23:53:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2010-12-01T00:00:14.181-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Unmet Expectations</title><summary type='text'>In the opinion section about the nation on yahoo.com is an article titled “Obama’s Failures…and Ours” written by Eric Alterman. Alterman is recalling what Obama stood for as a presidential candidate and also what those who voted for him expected from him as a president. Alterman explains why he believes that both the voters and the president are to blame for not achieving that which was expected.</summary><link rel='related' href='http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20101117/cm_thenation/156525' title='Unmet Expectations'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/1293548170795114785/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=1293548170795114785' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1293548170795114785'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1293548170795114785'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/11/unmet-expectations.html' title='Unmet Expectations'/><author><name>Mark Martinez</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-7542049433136982648</id><published>2010-11-30T22:34:00.003-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-30T22:42:51.776-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Voting Blindly or Not voting at all???</title><summary type='text'>I recently read a blog dedicated to the question: "Is it better to vote blindly, or not vote at all." Here area few of the responses. "Tough one Terri.  My view is the folks who don’t vote at all are worse. Some assume that their candidate is going to get in no problem &amp; one vote won’t sway it. If a number of people think that way then there is a huge problem.Those who don’t vote better not </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/7542049433136982648/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=7542049433136982648' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7542049433136982648'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7542049433136982648'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/11/voting-blindly-or-not-voting-at-all.html' title='Voting Blindly or Not voting at all???'/><author><name>Acypert</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='21' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_6-LCvjjN4ek/TKVA0tIw2bI/AAAAAAAAAAM/VuO8W62cfLs/S220/DSC_8120m.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-5691073903771951613</id><published>2010-11-30T21:52:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-30T21:56:21.740-07:00</updated><title type='text'>North Korea’s Stationary Bandit</title><summary type='text'>&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;     Normal   0               false   false   false      EN-US   X-NONE   X-NONE                                                                                                     &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/5691073903771951613/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=5691073903771951613' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/5691073903771951613'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/5691073903771951613'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/11/north-koreas-stationary-bandit.html' title='North Korea’s Stationary Bandit'/><author><name>Jeff B</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-1740229462739444452</id><published>2010-11-30T20:46:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2010-12-01T01:42:04.953-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Bush Tax Cuts</title><summary type='text'>A lot of people are under the impression that the Bush tax cuts are only going to effect the top two federal income tax brackets, but this of course is not the case. Unless Congress and the President take action, taxes will go up for everyone.. Not just the wealthy. While right now under the Bush tax cuts, the tax scale is 10%-35%, this would be raised to 15%-39.6% which would be hundreds or </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/1740229462739444452/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=1740229462739444452' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1740229462739444452'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1740229462739444452'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/11/bush-tax-cuts.html' title='Bush Tax Cuts'/><author><name>jamie_baby89</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-4757443717096773699</id><published>2010-11-30T19:06:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-12-01T10:58:50.340-07:00</updated><title type='text'>One Adaptation of the Stalin Method</title><summary type='text'>Steven Levitt briefly discusses Nicolae Ceauşescu, the former Communist dictator of Romania, in chapter four of his famous book, Freakonomics.  In 1966, Ceauşescu declared abortion to be illegal in Romania, stating that, “The fetus is the property of the entire society… Anyone who avoids having children is a deserter who abandons the laws of national continuity” (115).  He implied that it was a </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/4757443717096773699/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=4757443717096773699' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/4757443717096773699'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/4757443717096773699'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/11/one-adaptation-of-stalin-method.html' title='One Adaptation of the Stalin Method'/><author><name>Paige Sturgeon</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-1387861050365117247</id><published>2010-11-30T17:25:00.007-07:00</published><updated>2010-12-10T11:05:07.513-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Desperation and the Autocrat</title><summary type='text'>From the comfort of my partially-taxpayer funded university library, I am fortunate to be able to ponder the meaning of "power" and its implications over my life. This week, however, I've given some thought to an Orwellian world that seems to be the creation of psychologially unbalanced movie script writers. Yet that world truly existed for 29 years under the autocratic rule of Ioseb Jughashvili,</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/1387861050365117247/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=1387861050365117247' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1387861050365117247'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1387861050365117247'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/11/desperation-and-autocrat.html' title='Desperation and the Autocrat'/><author><name>Shah Rahman</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-8694405563258408991</id><published>2010-11-30T16:39:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-30T16:42:48.760-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Football Coaches or Roving Bandits</title><summary type='text'>@font-face {   font-family: "Times New Roman"; }p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }table.MsoNormalTable { font-size: 10pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }div.Section1 { page: Section1; }                Olson’s theory on roving and stationary bandits proves to be true in numerous situations. One situation </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/8694405563258408991/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=8694405563258408991' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/8694405563258408991'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/8694405563258408991'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/11/football-coaches-or-roving-bandits.html' title='Football Coaches or Roving Bandits'/><author><name>Dustin Goudreau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-5262207299846875881</id><published>2010-11-30T15:24:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-30T16:08:54.628-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Privatizing Social Security is still better than nothing!</title><summary type='text'>I just got done reading an article on the CNN Money website saying that Social Security privatization is a bad idea. The writer (Allan Sloan) was saying that the people retiring should not have to invest there money in the stock market. Allan Sloan said that the people are gambling that the market will be high when they retire. This is much better than giving your money to the government so it </summary><link rel='related' href='http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2010/11/30/privatizing-social-security-still-a-dumb-idea/' title='Privatizing Social Security is still better than nothing!'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/5262207299846875881/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=5262207299846875881' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/5262207299846875881'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/5262207299846875881'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/11/privatizing-social-security-is-still.html' title='Privatizing Social Security is still better than nothing!'/><author><name>Joel Green</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-2986692623765775675</id><published>2010-11-30T07:42:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-30T07:44:13.965-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Wealth?</title><summary type='text'>Olson dismisses the idea that differences in resource endowments, especially human capital or technology explain persistent poverty. Rather he argues that the institutions and economic policies – attributes that are mainly defined by national boundaries, affect the ability of the poor and others to “pick up their own big bills.” Olson took the debate a bit further concerning whether government </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/2986692623765775675/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=2986692623765775675' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/2986692623765775675'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/2986692623765775675'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/11/wealth.html' title='Wealth?'/><author><name>Kaila Lawson</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-5476012372518624784</id><published>2010-11-30T03:29:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-30T03:31:57.060-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Fiction to Fact 50 years in the making...</title><summary type='text'>It was by mere chance that I began to read Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand for my first time during the course of the fall 2010 semester.  I am a little over half way through the novel and if you haven’t had the opportunity to read it I would highly recommend that you do.  It’s as if Mancur Olson and Leo Tolstoy had a literary love child and out popped Ayn Rand.  Part of the novel read as if it was </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/5476012372518624784/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=5476012372518624784' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/5476012372518624784'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/5476012372518624784'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/11/fiction-to-fact-50-years-in-making.html' title='Fiction to Fact 50 years in the making...'/><author><name>Douglas Loeper</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-7542185352769753067</id><published>2010-11-29T23:10:00.010-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-30T16:10:49.895-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Some Thoughts on Media and Olson</title><summary type='text'>In the fifth chapter of Olson's Power and Prosperity, he briefly comments on media outlets and news sources, stating, "when the news is, by contrast, largely an alternative to other forms of diversion or entertainment for most people, intriguing oddities and human-interest items are in demand." He continues, commenting on how this situation may cause majorities to lose focus on that which truly </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/7542185352769753067/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=7542185352769753067' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7542185352769753067'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7542185352769753067'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/11/some-thoughts-on-media-and-olson.html' title='Some Thoughts on Media and Olson'/><author><name>Tim McDonnell</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-968515317471074955</id><published>2010-11-29T18:22:00.008-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-29T19:16:26.505-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Time is of the essence</title><summary type='text'>The market wizards, the Government and all news agencies continue to debate the need for the extension of the Bush tax cuts. In reality the tax system needs to be revamped. A flat tax of 15% across all incomes sounds better to me.  It will generate more revenues for the Federal Government, by allowing those millionaires and billionaires to finally pay taxes. The current system allows for tax </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/968515317471074955/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=968515317471074955' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/968515317471074955'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/968515317471074955'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/11/time-is-of-essence.html' title='Time is of the essence'/><author><name>Matthew Grubesic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-1524090443761762960</id><published>2010-11-29T14:50:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-29T14:50:42.980-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Auto Unions and Power</title><summary type='text'>The message the original buyout of GM sends has been vigorously debated by many sources. The story today that is not adequately being told is who is receiving the majority of the benefits from the GM stock sales. In the 2009 bankruptcy settlement the United Auto Workers Union secured a substantial portion of stock in the new General Motors. The U.S. Treasury and the Union have both begun to sell </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/1524090443761762960/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=1524090443761762960' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1524090443761762960'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1524090443761762960'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/11/auto-unions-and-power.html' title='Auto Unions and Power'/><author><name>Kristine Swift</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='25' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-YEeM8VsXuKc/TcYbFx7_jOI/AAAAAAAAAAM/2lwkb4Fy-4I/s1600/2252161517_c883b2d603.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-2794375382441038132</id><published>2010-11-27T18:35:00.005-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-27T19:59:52.875-07:00</updated><title type='text'>NFL - The New SEIU?</title><summary type='text'>As I was watching the morning news and the talking heads, my mind was blown to hear a commentator speaking right out of The Logic of Collective Action in reference to the possible 2011 season cancellation for the NFL. There were even ad hominem attacks going on! It was great!Now let me begin by saying that I know NOTHING about the NFL..In fact, I am not even sure I know what NFL stands for! But </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/2794375382441038132/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=2794375382441038132' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/2794375382441038132'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/2794375382441038132'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/11/nfl-new-seiu.html' title='NFL - The New SEIU?'/><author><name>Courtney Camelin</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-3790468628426369068</id><published>2010-11-21T14:48:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-21T14:50:22.771-07:00</updated><title type='text'>"The Greatest Capacity for Violence" in Northern Mexico</title><summary type='text'>The article “Northern Mexico's State of Anarchy,” which discusses the violence and war in northern Mexico, seems especially relevant to our current Mancur Olson book, Power and Prosperity. The article sights many instances of drug wars that are ravaging the northern cities. Many individuals have fled; those who remain live in constant fear. As Olson’s theory would predict, northern Mexico has </summary><link rel='related' href='http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704104104575622840256881122.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsSecond#' title='&quot;The Greatest Capacity for Violence&quot; in Northern Mexico'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/3790468628426369068/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=3790468628426369068' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/3790468628426369068'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/3790468628426369068'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/11/greatest-capacity-for-violence-in.html' title='&quot;The Greatest Capacity for Violence&quot; in Northern Mexico'/><author><name>Hannah Kovach</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-428611438520738662</id><published>2010-11-19T09:32:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-19T09:47:35.923-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Bernanke needs to read Rise and Decline</title><summary type='text'>Read this article and you will see lots of the same ideas drawn up by Olsen in R+D. In the second paragraph Bernanke is paraphrased as saying that nations need to work together because countries are recovering at uneven rates.  And then he goes on to say that teamwork is struggling because a "sense of common purpose" has waned.  Well if we think about this from an economists standpoint, and the </summary><link rel='related' href='http://money.cnn.com/2010/11/18/news/economy/Bernanke_Frankfurt_defense/' title='Bernanke needs to read Rise and Decline'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/428611438520738662/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=428611438520738662' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/428611438520738662'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/428611438520738662'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/11/bernanke-needs-to-read-rise-and-decline.html' title='Bernanke needs to read Rise and Decline'/><author><name>Spencer Baucke</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-5732732386491311539</id><published>2010-11-04T15:13:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-11-04T15:35:51.152-06:00</updated><title type='text'>The Hope for Democracy in Iraq</title><summary type='text'>The status of Iraq was brought up today in class while comparing the successes of countries that the United States has waged war with like Germany and Japan.  Although there is a measure of uncertainty to how the whole situation will end up, there are a few things that could tell us how this one is gonna go.  When the US military rolled through the sandbox in March of 2003 on their way to Baghdad</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/5732732386491311539/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=5732732386491311539' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/5732732386491311539'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/5732732386491311539'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/11/hope-for-democracy-in-iraq.html' title='The Hope for Democracy in Iraq'/><author><name>Spencer Baucke</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-6229857027084114285</id><published>2010-11-04T05:17:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-11-04T05:21:15.104-06:00</updated><title type='text'>GDP Charts</title><summary type='text'>You can see some illustrations of per capita GDP by country over time by following this link.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/6229857027084114285/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=6229857027084114285' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6229857027084114285'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6229857027084114285'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/11/gdp-charts.html' title='GDP Charts'/><author><name>Larry Eubanks</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15566964700226634137</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-6909584943331436320</id><published>2010-10-31T23:59:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-11-01T00:02:07.920-06:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;     Normal   0               false   false   false      EN-US   X-NONE   X-NONE                                                                                                     &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/6909584943331436320/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=6909584943331436320' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6909584943331436320'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6909584943331436320'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/private-accounts-for-social-security.html' title=''/><author><name>Jeff B</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-6172807595668530063</id><published>2010-10-31T23:36:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-31T23:37:00.779-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Outside groups contribute most to campaign spending this year.</title><summary type='text'>&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;     Normal   0               false   false   false      EN-US   X-NONE   X-NONE                                                                                                     &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/6172807595668530063/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=6172807595668530063' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6172807595668530063'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6172807595668530063'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/outside-groups-contribute-most-to.html' title='Outside groups contribute most to campaign spending this year.'/><author><name>Jeff B</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-9042733090128185885</id><published>2010-10-31T22:17:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-31T22:38:39.686-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Planning For Death</title><summary type='text'>U.S. Rep. Cynthia Lummis is saying that some people are planning to stop life extending treatments such as dialysis so they die before December 31st. At the beginning of next year estate taxes will be reenacted. The current tax cuts cover large inheritances but once the new year rolls in the tax will go from 0 to a maximum 55 percent. As we talked in class when we use estate taxes we are </summary><link rel='related' href='http://trib.com/news/state-and-regional/article_d826231c-ae29-576b-b23a-13bb9c16dcdc.html' title='Planning For Death'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/9042733090128185885/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=9042733090128185885' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/9042733090128185885'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/9042733090128185885'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/planning-for-death.html' title='Planning For Death'/><author><name>Joel Green</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-7989380131553427684</id><published>2010-10-31T21:58:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-31T23:01:42.821-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Boy Scouts... of America??</title><summary type='text'>I read an article recently about a mother and father whose two elementary school-aged sons were members of Boy Scout “pack,” sponsored by a Presbyterian (which falls under the umbrella of Protestant) Church.  The couple enthusiastically volunteered for leadership positions in the pack, and the church was pleased to have them… until it was discovered that the family was Mormon.  The parents were </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/7989380131553427684/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=7989380131553427684' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7989380131553427684'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7989380131553427684'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/boy-scouts-of-america.html' title='Boy Scouts... of America??'/><author><name>Paige Sturgeon</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-5367249500080992334</id><published>2010-10-31T20:22:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-31T20:23:22.552-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Social Contract Theory</title><summary type='text'>The United States of America is considered to be one of the most prosperous nations in history. The country fares well in traditional economic rankings such as GDP, and has a history full of innovation and progress. The founders of this great country set out to develop a new nation in the sight of God. However, they did not create their new society from scratch. They were profoundly influenced by</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/5367249500080992334/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=5367249500080992334' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/5367249500080992334'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/5367249500080992334'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/social-contract-theory.html' title='Social Contract Theory'/><author><name>Kristine Swift</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='25' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-YEeM8VsXuKc/TcYbFx7_jOI/AAAAAAAAAAM/2lwkb4Fy-4I/s1600/2252161517_c883b2d603.jpg'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-7769362454552256869</id><published>2010-10-31T17:39:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-31T17:43:29.170-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Innovation</title><summary type='text'>Innovation is something that I believe most people can agree is a good thing and helps a society to become more prosperous. The argument on this subject begins when bringing government into the equation. Is more government control beneficial in fostering increased innovation or does it hurt innovation? There are both arguments for and against bigger government but Steven Johnson the author of the</summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/31/business/31every.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=1&amp;ref=business' title='Innovation'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/7769362454552256869/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=7769362454552256869' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7769362454552256869'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7769362454552256869'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/innovation.html' title='Innovation'/><author><name>Mark Martinez</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-1405324903783733053</id><published>2010-10-31T17:19:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-31T17:20:20.706-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Babies and laws and special interest groups, oh my!</title><summary type='text'>The health care law has always been a great controversy, and now the controversy continues over what was meant by the wording within the law.  One of the current issues is whether the law is meant to cover birth control.  This is where the special interest groups come in.  In this case Planned Parenthood is fighting that it is included in the law, while the National Catholic Bioethics Center is </summary><link rel='related' href='http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101031/ap_on_he_me/us_birth_control' title='Babies and laws and special interest groups, oh my!'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/1405324903783733053/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=1405324903783733053' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1405324903783733053'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1405324903783733053'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/babies-and-laws-and-special-interest.html' title='Babies and laws and special interest groups, oh my!'/><author><name>Lauren Peterson</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-1064846695387536941</id><published>2010-10-31T16:56:00.007-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-31T19:32:46.793-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Political Climate and Recent Rallies/ Protests</title><summary type='text'>The emergence of rallies and protests during this midterm political season coupled with the study of Olson's works has been quite interesting. Although I may have little in terms of historical context to compare the contemporary movements with, I feel as if the unrest and uncertainty is manifesting itself not only in the form of Tea Parties but also as such: Glenn Beck's "Restoring Honor Rally," </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/1064846695387536941/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=1064846695387536941' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1064846695387536941'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1064846695387536941'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/political-climate-and-recent-rallies.html' title='Political Climate and Recent Rallies/ Protests'/><author><name>Tim McDonnell</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-8767902247565150659</id><published>2010-10-31T15:36:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-31T15:41:15.118-06:00</updated><title type='text'>The Mayor Project--A Matter of Encompassing Interests</title><summary type='text'>Election Day is rapidly approaching and with it one issue that has particularly caught my attention: the Mayor Project (Initiative 300). This initiative advocates a change in the structure of the Colorado Springs city government from a Council/Manager format, where an elected city council appoints a city manager, to a Mayor/Council format, where the citizen body directly elects a mayor. </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/8767902247565150659/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=8767902247565150659' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/8767902247565150659'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/8767902247565150659'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/mayor-project-matter-of-encompassing.html' title='The Mayor Project--A Matter of Encompassing Interests'/><author><name>Sarah Kovach</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-4960237848838461380</id><published>2010-10-31T03:17:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-31T04:20:35.293-06:00</updated><title type='text'>So would you change your vote?</title><summary type='text'>In class a couple of weeks ago Dr. Eubanks asked the class a question... "knowing what you know now, would it change your vote"? I didn't feel as though I was able to answer this completely so for this month I thought I'd provide some insight into my answer.I feel that modern day politics, unfortunately, impacts two major aspects of our lives, social and economic. Socially speaking politics has </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/4960237848838461380/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=4960237848838461380' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/4960237848838461380'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/4960237848838461380'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/so-would-you-change-your-vote.html' title='So would you change your vote?'/><author><name>Douglas Loeper</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-7031053110484068168</id><published>2010-10-29T10:26:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-29T10:28:13.972-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Two Takes on Political Donations</title><summary type='text'>I think you will be interested in this comment on interest group contributions.</summary><link rel='related' href='http://thinkmarkets.wordpress.com/2010/10/24/two-takes-on-political-donations/' title='Two Takes on Political Donations'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/7031053110484068168/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=7031053110484068168' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7031053110484068168'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7031053110484068168'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/two-takes-on-political-donations.html' title='Two Takes on Political Donations'/><author><name>Larry Eubanks</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15566964700226634137</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-8766606874725221914</id><published>2010-10-27T17:45:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-27T17:48:04.954-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Guilds in Europe</title><summary type='text'>Our conversation in class regarding guilds sparked my interest. I started to wonder what exactly they were about and wondered how they impacted the communities they lived in and how they fell from ruling these towns. As I started research, I started to focus on the guilds in Europe, although there were many forms of guilds across many different geographical areas.The definition of a guild is ‘an </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/8766606874725221914/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=8766606874725221914' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/8766606874725221914'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/8766606874725221914'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/guilds-in-europe.html' title='Guilds in Europe'/><author><name>Kaila Lawson</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-6397544195498205201</id><published>2010-10-27T13:00:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-31T23:59:41.375-06:00</updated><title type='text'>From the Mouths of Babes</title><summary type='text'>When the study of economics first bit me, I wondered whether Social Security will have a check waiting for me upon retirement. Lately I've wondered whether our proud nation will remain financially solvent by the time I graduate.  Such thoughts never crept into my mind as a child. During that blissful era, our country enjoyed decent growth rates, internal peace and freedom from foreign military </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/6397544195498205201/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=6397544195498205201' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6397544195498205201'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6397544195498205201'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/from-mouths-of-babes.html' title='From the Mouths of Babes'/><author><name>Shah Rahman</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-8568113725195742206</id><published>2010-10-26T14:50:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-26T15:43:53.515-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Republican or Democcrat it does not matter</title><summary type='text'>It is an unfortunate time in American history, many people on main street feel that by voting in the Republicans at this midterm election that the changes needed to turn around the economy will prevail. Not true. Until both parties realize that the special interest groups and lobbyists that have  gained more power than the people the politicians represent are dissolved, the issues with our </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/8568113725195742206/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=8568113725195742206' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/8568113725195742206'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/8568113725195742206'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/republican-or-democcrat-it-does-not.html' title='Republican or Democcrat it does not matter'/><author><name>Matthew Grubesic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-253040008826138693</id><published>2010-10-22T14:33:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-22T14:37:37.623-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Illegal Immigrants: Harmful or Helpful?</title><summary type='text'>As I read through Rise and Decline I was struck by how an influx of labor in an already densely populated country like the United States grew faster after the increase in labor than before.  I was immensely puzzled by this statement so I decided to do some thinking (yes I needed Tylenol) and some research.  One argument I could find for letting illegals work in the US is that they help correct </summary><link rel='related' href='http://blogs.chron.com/immigration/archives/2008/08/post_151.html' title='Illegal Immigrants: Harmful or Helpful?'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/253040008826138693/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=253040008826138693' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/253040008826138693'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/253040008826138693'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/illegal-immigrants-harmful-or-helpful.html' title='Illegal Immigrants: Harmful or Helpful?'/><author><name>Spencer Baucke</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-7997153123653492566</id><published>2010-10-20T12:16:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-20T12:19:24.335-06:00</updated><title type='text'>The Dynamics of Prosperity</title><summary type='text'>According to The American Heritage Dictionary, prosperity is “the condition of being prosperous,” which in turn means “having success; flourishing.” An intrinsic aspect of this definition is that it is dynamic, not static. After all, in order for something to flourish, something must be changing for the better (i.e., advancing). Dr. Eubanks has emphasized again and again that Olson’s theories are</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/7997153123653492566/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=7997153123653492566' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7997153123653492566'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7997153123653492566'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/dynamics-of-prosperity.html' title='The Dynamics of Prosperity'/><author><name>Hannah Kovach</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-8893457556565402994</id><published>2010-10-16T09:13:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-18T06:38:26.777-06:00</updated><title type='text'>China’s Labor Strikes &amp; Business Models</title><summary type='text'>I mentioned in class that I was not much of a China watcher.  I just ran across a news article about China, and here is a little bit that would seem relevant to thinking about the logic and its implications in China:"Manufacturing costs have risen rapidly here in response to nagging labor shortages and worker demands for higher wages to help offset soaring food and property prices.Those pressures</summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/16/business/global/16factory.html?_r=2&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=China%20shifs%20away%20from%20low-cost%20factories&amp;st=Search' title='China’s Labor Strikes &amp; Business Models'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/8893457556565402994/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=8893457556565402994' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/8893457556565402994'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/8893457556565402994'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/chinas-labor-strikes-business-models.html' title='China’s Labor Strikes &amp; Business Models'/><author><name>Larry Eubanks</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15566964700226634137</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-6574540760213595161</id><published>2010-10-13T20:48:00.008-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-13T22:21:38.905-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Do Rise and Fall Theories Apply to Russia?</title><summary type='text'>As discussed in Rise and Fall, the countries Germany, France, and Japan all thrived post WWII partly because the rebuilding of the nation eliminated a lot of the organization that had hindered economic growth.  These organizations are what has also hindered economic growth in countries like Britain.  Although Olsen mainly discusses these three countries I am quite interested in how Olsen theories</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/6574540760213595161/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=6574540760213595161' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6574540760213595161'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6574540760213595161'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/do-rise-and-fall-theories-apply-to.html' title='Do Rise and Fall Theories Apply to Russia?'/><author><name>Spencer Baucke</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-7284508435920664333</id><published>2010-10-12T18:30:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-12T19:07:37.953-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Political Forces In Germany</title><summary type='text'>As a student of economics, I am an avid reader of The Economist, Forbes, Businessweek, WSJ, and any other publication even remotely economic that I can lay my hands on. For the better part of two years I have been reading about Germany's growth, relatively strong economy, and how they are the backbone of the EU economy. While reading Chapter 4 in Rise and Decline, Olsen speaks to his prediction </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/7284508435920664333/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=7284508435920664333' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7284508435920664333'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7284508435920664333'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/political-forces-in-germany.html' title='Political Forces In Germany'/><author><name>Courtney Camelin</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-1388075294625770717</id><published>2010-09-30T23:34:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-30T23:36:48.416-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Aggressiveness not in China’s long term interests</title><summary type='text'>&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;     Normal   0               false   false   false      EN-US   X-NONE   X-NONE                                                     MicrosoftInternetExplorer4                                                   &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/1388075294625770717/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=1388075294625770717' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1388075294625770717'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1388075294625770717'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/09/aggressiveness-not-in-chinas-long-term.html' title='Aggressiveness not in China’s long term interests'/><author><name>Jeff B</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-5376050537890581691</id><published>2010-09-30T23:16:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-03T11:40:19.941-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Small Business Jobs Act</title><summary type='text'>We live in a time period in which many people love to express their political opinions, devoid of any consideration toward how it will make others feel, or what it will cause others to think about them.   We are all “rationally ignorant,” as we have discussed, to varying degrees, but problematically, people are often oblivious to the fact that they are rationally ignorant.  Simply, they do not </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/5376050537890581691/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=5376050537890581691' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/5376050537890581691'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/5376050537890581691'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/09/small-businesses-job-act.html' title='Small Business Jobs Act'/><author><name>Paige Sturgeon</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-4697809442281472303</id><published>2010-09-30T22:17:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-30T23:08:10.622-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Campaign Money</title><summary type='text'>Over the past decade, the amount of campaing financing for state judicial races has increased dramatically. The Supreme Court has always classified this money spending as constitutional under the right to free speech. In general, it's been shown that the more money that is spent on campaigns means the more knowledge voters have because they can access information more easily. So there are obvious</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/4697809442281472303/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=4697809442281472303' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/4697809442281472303'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/4697809442281472303'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/09/campaign-money.html' title='Campaign Money'/><author><name>jamie_baby89</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-8939304136489989458</id><published>2010-09-30T20:33:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-30T21:20:59.272-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Outside Applications</title><summary type='text'>Being a student of economic study I can’t help myself but to try and apply the teachings of and spreading the good word of economics to the less informed.  With that being said in our advanced business &amp; technical writing class we are reworking the new member presentation of a local business group, The Colorado Springs Convention Visitor’s Bureau (CSCVB).  The current design of the presentation </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/8939304136489989458/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=8939304136489989458' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/8939304136489989458'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/8939304136489989458'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/09/outside-applications.html' title='Outside Applications'/><author><name>Douglas Loeper</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-3735291095275427126</id><published>2010-09-30T19:25:00.008-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-30T21:29:22.514-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Greek Lessons: Testing the Limits of Membership</title><summary type='text'>European. Union."European" conjures images of cultural and financial prosperity, and a long history of monarchy and military power. "Union," for those familiar with Mancur Olson's Logic of Collective Action, represents a generally large form of organization which depends upon coercion or selective incentivization of its members to maintain group efforts toward the common goal of collective </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/3735291095275427126/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=3735291095275427126' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/3735291095275427126'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/3735291095275427126'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/09/greek-lessons-testing-limits-of.html' title='Greek Lessons: Testing the Limits of Membership'/><author><name>Shah Rahman</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-3543495355593589442</id><published>2010-09-30T18:23:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-30T18:28:10.494-06:00</updated><title type='text'>NBA Lockout a Possibility</title><summary type='text'>I came across an article on nba.com concerning a meeting between the National Basketball Association and the National Basketball Players Association or NBPA. The NBPA is the labor union of the players in the NBA. This players union was constructed in 1954 at a time when the NBA offered no minimum salary, health benefits or pension plan. The average player’s salary was approximately $8,000 per </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.nba.com/2010/news/09/22/cba-meeting/' title='NBA Lockout a Possibility'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/3543495355593589442/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=3543495355593589442' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/3543495355593589442'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/3543495355593589442'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/09/nba-lockout-possibility.html' title='NBA Lockout a Possibility'/><author><name>Mark Martinez</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-6758088013378455593</id><published>2010-09-30T17:42:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-30T18:33:02.873-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Nothing Has Changed</title><summary type='text'>As I look at the last 2 years of the so-called US recovery, I see no recovery. The politicians continue to manipulate the  static economic model, the federal reserve (a cartel) is more concerned with keeping their elite associates in business (banks, wall street, autos) with 0% loans, and supporting an absurd monetary policy by monitizing the US debt. I would have thought this turmoil would have </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/6758088013378455593/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=6758088013378455593' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6758088013378455593'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6758088013378455593'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/09/nothing-has-changed.html' title='Nothing Has Changed'/><author><name>Matthew Grubesic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-7280481207570850925</id><published>2010-09-30T15:37:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-30T15:42:35.608-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Kaiser Employees Decide Whether Between Being Represented by Large Union or Small</title><summary type='text'>@font-face {   font-family: "Times New Roman"; }p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }table.MsoNormalTable { font-size: 10pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }div.Section1 { page: Section1; }    Kaiser employees in California have been given a choice on whether to stay with SEIU, (Service Employees International </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/7280481207570850925/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=7280481207570850925' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7280481207570850925'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7280481207570850925'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/09/kaiser-employees-decide-whether-between.html' title='Kaiser Employees Decide Whether Between Being Represented by Large Union or Small'/><author><name>Dustin Goudreau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-1229639843229516708</id><published>2010-09-30T15:21:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-30T15:22:56.365-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Wally World is taking over!!</title><summary type='text'>It’s true, Walmart is going to take over the world one day, and it’s pretty much inevitable at this point.  Walmart is also very anti-union.  Who can blame them?  Unions were bad to being with, but then you read even more about it from Olson and you begin to wonder why they even exist.  We’ve all heard various horror stories about unions, the union giving the air traffic controllers the air </summary><link rel='related' href='http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2010/09/30/walmarts-south-africa-play-storm-clouds-ahead/' title='Wally World is taking over!!'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/1229639843229516708/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=1229639843229516708' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1229639843229516708'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1229639843229516708'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/09/wally-world-is-taking-over.html' title='Wally World is taking over!!'/><author><name>Lauren Peterson</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-734870070591571376</id><published>2010-09-28T18:54:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-28T19:58:01.246-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Marijuana Begins to Unionize</title><summary type='text'>Browsing through an edition of the Wall Street Journal from about a  week ago, I discovered an article titled "Teamsters Organize Medical Marijuana Growers." Stu Woo, the author of the article, spoke on what he perceives to be the "first pot growers to unionize in the country," stating that around "40 employees of an Oakland, Calif., marijuana-growing company joined the Teamsters union earlier </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/734870070591571376/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=734870070591571376' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/734870070591571376'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/734870070591571376'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/09/marijuana-begins-to-unionize.html' title='Marijuana Begins to Unionize'/><author><name>Tim McDonnell</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-4826757475366972436</id><published>2010-09-28T15:00:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-28T15:36:42.807-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Unions vs Peter Jackon</title><summary type='text'>Peter Jackson wants to film the two-part Hobbit movie series in New Zealand. The original Lord of the Rings trilogy was filmed in New Zealand and he wants to continue filming there because it adds a lot to the movie with the big environments. Peter Jackson is employing thousands of workers to make these movies. The studios are ready to start filming but there is one problem... There are no actors</summary><link rel='related' href='http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/the_big_picture/2010/09/will-peter-jackson-get-labeled-a-union-buster-on-the-hobbit.html' title='Unions vs Peter Jackon'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/4826757475366972436/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=4826757475366972436' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/4826757475366972436'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/4826757475366972436'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/09/unions-vs-peter-jackon.html' title='Unions vs Peter Jackon'/><author><name>Joel Green</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-951637308301730633</id><published>2010-09-28T14:47:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-28T17:27:19.053-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Incentives</title><summary type='text'>The fundamental axiom of Mancur Olson’s The Logic of Collective Action is that people act with a purpose. People will act when it is in their self-interest to become involved. Large groups that do not hold power through the application of government force have found that they can gain members by offering selective incentives. People respond to all sorts of incentives: both positive and negative. </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/951637308301730633/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=951637308301730633' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/951637308301730633'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/951637308301730633'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/09/limited-liability.html' title='Incentives'/><author><name>Kristine Swift</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='25' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-YEeM8VsXuKc/TcYbFx7_jOI/AAAAAAAAAAM/2lwkb4Fy-4I/s1600/2252161517_c883b2d603.jpg'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-5330651363910126192</id><published>2010-09-22T20:56:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-22T20:59:40.239-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Social Security</title><summary type='text'>On page 171 in the appendix Olson states, “But even a project that involves more gain than cost will leave more losers than gainers, if the gains go to a minority of those in the jurisdiction and the cost is covered through jurisdiction-wide taxes. When a collective good reaches only a minority of those in a jurisdiction, then, it will not get majority support, and will be provided, if at all, </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=1631' title='Social Security'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/5330651363910126192/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=5330651363910126192' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/5330651363910126192'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/5330651363910126192'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/09/social-security.html' title='Social Security'/><author><name>Kaila Lawson</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-8727480619649930583</id><published>2010-09-18T14:40:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-18T14:47:51.957-06:00</updated><title type='text'>People Act with a Purpose</title><summary type='text'>People act with a purpose. When Dr. Eubanks mentioned this idea on Thursday, it resounded with me. This axiom on which Mancur Olson basis his theory in The Logic of Collective Action does a great deal in providing an explanation for any and every human behavior. No matter who the person is or what he decides to do, he exists for a purpose, and he decides for a reason. Every individual who acts </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/8727480619649930583/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=8727480619649930583' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/8727480619649930583'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/8727480619649930583'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/09/people-act-with-purpose.html' title='People Act with a Purpose'/><author><name>Sarah Kovach</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-2051732103026948176</id><published>2010-09-13T17:20:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-13T20:19:08.106-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Logic and the NFL</title><summary type='text'>Yes the title is correct, the logic of collective action and the National Football League.  How do those two belong in the same sentence together? Well let me tell you.  I love the NFL(and yes the Bengals are going to win the Super Bowl this year like every year right until they go 3-13), and sometimes its easy to lose sight that the players on the field aren't just football players but they are </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.shmoop.com/nfl-history/labor.html' title='Logic and the NFL'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/2051732103026948176/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=2051732103026948176' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/2051732103026948176'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/2051732103026948176'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/09/logic-and-nfl.html' title='Logic and the NFL'/><author><name>Spencer Baucke</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-7060169142863071374</id><published>2010-09-12T15:06:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-12T15:10:25.072-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Logic and the American Revolution</title><summary type='text'>On Thursday, Dr. Eubanks posed an intriguing question: “Is the American Revolution consistent with The Logic of Collective Action? What was different about this revolution that allowed it to end in democracy?” To probe our minds, he provided a suggestion: the American Revolution arose for the protection of individual rights, something the British government had discontinued. Dr. Eubanks </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/7060169142863071374/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=7060169142863071374' title='5 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7060169142863071374'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7060169142863071374'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/09/logic-and-american-revolution.html' title='Logic and the American Revolution'/><author><name>Hannah Kovach</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>5</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-2529736272942209920</id><published>2010-09-10T14:04:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-10T14:09:43.661-06:00</updated><title type='text'>ASHA and Other Professional Associations</title><summary type='text'>In The Logic of Collective Action, Mancur Olson theorizes that any large group must be held together by one of two factors: force or selective incentives. As I have been reading and contemplating his work, I have also been attempting to apply his theory to groups that matter to me. Since I would like to become a speech-language pathologist, one organization (or group) that came to my mind was </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/2529736272942209920/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=2529736272942209920' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/2529736272942209920'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/2529736272942209920'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/09/asha-and-other-professional.html' title='ASHA and Other Professional Associations'/><author><name>Sarah Kovach</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-1593751388635385346</id><published>2010-09-08T11:53:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-08T12:07:14.628-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Healthcare Scare</title><summary type='text'>As a former healthcare finance manager with 15 years of experience in the industry, I'd be remiss if I didn't start this post with the admission that I MAY be a bit biased on this issue. My perspective comes from being an industry insider as well as a student of economics. That being said, as we read The Logic of Collective Action, I can't help but consider the healthcare reform legislation in </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/1593751388635385346/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=1593751388635385346' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1593751388635385346'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1593751388635385346'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2010/09/blog-post.html' title='Healthcare Scare'/><author><name>Courtney Camelin</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-1855639852907322865</id><published>2008-10-31T15:09:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2008-10-31T15:14:31.128-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Liberalism</title><summary type='text'>As we have dicussed throughout the entire semester, most of us agree that a liberal economy is the best way to go.  With all of the interventions that the government makes it drives our economy down and is one of the main reasons that we are in such an economic turmoil right now.  Why, if this is so obvious of an answer to most of us in class is it so hard for the politicians and the high ranking</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/1855639852907322865/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=1855639852907322865' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1855639852907322865'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1855639852907322865'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/10/liberalism.html' title='Liberalism'/><author><name>Luke Smith</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-463824962941753079</id><published>2008-05-16T14:11:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2008-05-16T14:16:18.527-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Is America Still Racist?</title><summary type='text'>Doggy Discrimination occurs daily.  When I read this I laughed not taking it seriously, all dogs are cute right? Well apparently some people prefer a certain color of dog. This is understandable, but color discrimination among dogs? Black dogs are not being adopted in shelters. They seem to be the last ones adopted from almost every kennel in the country. A Kennel in Ohio even posted a banner </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/463824962941753079/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=463824962941753079' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/463824962941753079'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/463824962941753079'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/05/is-america-still-racist.html' title='Is America Still Racist?'/><author><name>MeganVidal</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-1564270571693975144</id><published>2008-05-16T14:10:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2008-05-16T14:11:38.841-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Student Loans the new Sub Prime Crisis?</title><summary type='text'>Recently while zoning out in front of the T.V. I heard several advertisements for student loans. These ads suggested that students could borrow up to $40,000 per year to cover college expenses. This seemed exorbitant so I researched a little and sure enough websites such as Astrive.com and ThinkStudentLoans.com both offered these amounts.  I know some high profile private schools are expensive, </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/1564270571693975144/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=1564270571693975144' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1564270571693975144'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1564270571693975144'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/05/student-loans-new-sub-prime-crisis.html' title='Student Loans the new Sub Prime Crisis?'/><author><name>MeganVidal</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-6310917463738441655</id><published>2008-05-16T14:09:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2008-05-16T14:10:37.531-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Stephen Colbert Brings to light the sclerosis of America</title><summary type='text'>Stephen Colbert, host of the Colbert Report began a new series in February called Better Know a Lobby, in which he interviews lobbyist and examines their agendas. The humor of the series is that it supposedly consists of 35,000 parts because that is the approximate number of lobbyist in Washington. On Wednesday March 12, Colbert introduced the series by saying “I thought our laws were written by </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/6310917463738441655/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=6310917463738441655' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6310917463738441655'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6310917463738441655'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/05/stephen-colbert-brings-to-light.html' title='Stephen Colbert Brings to light the sclerosis of America'/><author><name>MeganVidal</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-2123495128603303418</id><published>2008-05-16T05:39:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2008-05-16T06:03:22.605-06:00</updated><title type='text'>The Fed messing around with the economy</title><summary type='text'>I used to believe that the Fed was doing more good for the economy than doing it harm. I'm starting to question these thoughts now.  How is the the Fed's impact on the economy by changing the money supply and interest rate going to help? It's natural to have times of economic growth and have times of economic recession. That is just all part of the economic cycle. Now the argument has been made </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/2123495128603303418/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=2123495128603303418' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/2123495128603303418'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/2123495128603303418'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/05/fed-messing-around-with-economy.html' title='The Fed messing around with the economy'/><author><name>Will Evans</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-7812890283710997346</id><published>2008-05-16T04:38:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2008-05-16T05:39:17.638-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Private Property</title><summary type='text'>Private Property rights are pretty much the best thing since sliced bread...ok, they probably came before sliced bread. Private property creates stability in a society. When someone own's something they are going to take good care of it. It is in their self-interest to take good care of their own possessions. Private property also aids in law enforcement. With private property there is an </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/7812890283710997346/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=7812890283710997346' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7812890283710997346'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7812890283710997346'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/05/private-property.html' title='Private Property'/><author><name>Will Evans</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-8328998776855235273</id><published>2008-05-15T20:07:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2008-05-16T03:35:44.349-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Myanmar Crisis</title><summary type='text'>Since I've been following the recent crises in Myanmar I thought I would check out the Economic situation of the country and share what I learn with you all. I went to CIA World Factbook at this link: https://webmail.uccs.edu/SRedirect/www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bm.html to get a quick overview of the country. The country obviously includes most of the symptoms for a </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/8328998776855235273/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=8328998776855235273' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/8328998776855235273'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/8328998776855235273'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/05/myanmar-crisis.html' title='Myanmar Crisis'/><author><name>Will Evans</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-6406469433437822398</id><published>2008-05-15T15:12:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2008-05-15T15:15:35.366-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Police Power</title><summary type='text'>A theory of power within society allows one to examine the mundane coercive forces of life with a clear mind free of emotional attachment. It is my hope to expound on such a theory. I start, ironically, with an observation.I found myself in a parking lot at approximately 11:00 pm. The parking lot was empty except for my friend's car beside my own and a hidden police car. The police car remained </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/6406469433437822398/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=6406469433437822398' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6406469433437822398'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6406469433437822398'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/05/police-power.html' title='Police Power'/><author><name>Larry Eubanks</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15566964700226634137</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-253299153807749108</id><published>2008-05-15T15:09:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2008-05-15T15:12:26.832-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Efficiency and Defense</title><summary type='text'>How can be defense be privatized? I cannot answer that more than I can answer how watches and delicious miniature pickles could be provided for privately.Usually the question is asked by people with a modicum of economic understanding or sometimes by people with much greater insight. It's these people and not the women and effeminate males goaded into outbursts of "WELL WHAT ABOUT" with the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/253299153807749108/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=253299153807749108' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/253299153807749108'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/253299153807749108'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/05/efficiency-and-defense.html' title='Efficiency and Defense'/><author><name>Larry Eubanks</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15566964700226634137</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-5530789342449127593</id><published>2008-05-15T15:07:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2008-05-15T15:09:47.713-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Clear Thinking</title><summary type='text'>Thomas S. Szasz is to psychiatry as Ludwig Von Mises is to political economy. Szasz is most noted for his opposition to classifying behavior as an illness; that so-called “mental-illness” is a myth. This is as close one can get to “swimming up stream” without touching water. In a similar manner, Von Mises was writing about the idea that less government intervention was the answer to prosperity in</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/5530789342449127593/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=5530789342449127593' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/5530789342449127593'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/5530789342449127593'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/05/clear-thinking.html' title='Clear Thinking'/><author><name>Larry Eubanks</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15566964700226634137</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-6425462810434862380</id><published>2008-05-09T17:29:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2008-05-09T17:51:19.100-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Why Not?</title><summary type='text'>So I am really having a time trying to figure out the root of this power thing.  I know in class we decided that one "reason" for power was the one with the greatest capacity for violence usually yielded the power.  But what about those in power that do not use violence?Here is where I am getting this.  In Becker-Posner's farm bill blog, they discuss the farm bill and such, but more importantly </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/6425462810434862380/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=6425462810434862380' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6425462810434862380'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6425462810434862380'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/05/why-not.html' title='Why Not?'/><author><name>Craig T Glackman</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-7647730339039410188</id><published>2008-05-08T22:28:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2008-05-08T22:34:40.553-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Definition: The Theory of The Logic of Power</title><summary type='text'>The theory of the logic of power is that it is adaptive and it evolves. From anarchy in the sense of privately enforced trade, to roving banditry, to stationary banditry to autocracy to the cooperation of autocrats to the emergence of democracy, power disperses. As power disperses, so does prosperity; prosperity grows. If a government holding power allows for the prosperity to disperse, power </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/7647730339039410188/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=7647730339039410188' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7647730339039410188'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7647730339039410188'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/05/definition-theory-of-logic-of-power.html' title='Definition: The Theory of The Logic of Power'/><author><name>Alan C. Earing</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-1357920353529015398</id><published>2008-05-01T12:54:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2008-05-01T13:23:02.250-06:00</updated><title type='text'>The Costs of war vs. the Benefits</title><summary type='text'>Crossfire on NBC lately has been covering the war vs. our economy, and most of the important information is there but they fail to see where one expenditure affects another in war.  In todays United states economy, war surrounds us in every direction.  someone has to pay for it, such as the American taxpayers.  Disregarding the legitimacy of actually entering a war, the following post will </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/1357920353529015398/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=1357920353529015398' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1357920353529015398'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1357920353529015398'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/05/costs-of-war-vs-benefits.html' title='The Costs of war vs. the Benefits'/><author><name>Brandon Weber</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-4496193827987710742</id><published>2008-05-01T02:23:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2008-05-01T02:43:02.912-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Are some cultures better than others?</title><summary type='text'>The discussion in P&amp;P about Iraq and what would bring greater success there got me thinking about a very basic question that many people don't consider when forming the foundation for a logical and sensical analysis--namely, can you say that some cultures are inferior?I believe that unlike most of the major controversies or conflicts that dominate the agenda of our society today, the question of </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/4496193827987710742/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=4496193827987710742' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/4496193827987710742'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/4496193827987710742'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/05/are-some-cultures-better-than-others.html' title='Are some cultures better than others?'/><author><name>Drew</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-2227730732388224610</id><published>2008-05-01T02:15:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2008-05-01T02:21:26.804-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Are some cultures better than others?  Of Course.</title><summary type='text'></summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/2227730732388224610/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=2227730732388224610' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/2227730732388224610'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/2227730732388224610'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/05/are-some-cultures-better-than-others-of.html' title='Are some cultures better than others?  Of Course.'/><author><name>Drew</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-988037093999033247</id><published>2008-04-30T23:39:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2008-04-30T23:40:58.112-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Zimbabwe - Recipe for disaster</title><summary type='text'>Zimbabwe is currently in an economic crisis.  According to the CIA World Factbook, inflation in the private sector rages well above 100,000%. The country is suffering from a -6% growth rate, 80% unemployment, and 68% of the population is below the poverty line.  “Botswana built electric fences and South Africa has placed military along the border to stem the flow of thousands of Zimbabweans </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/988037093999033247/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=988037093999033247' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/988037093999033247'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/988037093999033247'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/04/zimbabwe-recipe-for-disaster.html' title='Zimbabwe - Recipe for disaster'/><author><name>Lisa Wermuth</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-2084084287075256467</id><published>2008-04-30T22:09:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2008-04-30T22:13:46.484-06:00</updated><title type='text'>The Incentives of War</title><summary type='text'>Olson offers powerful insights on why it is sometimes necessary to go to war in order to exhibit our military might – for that exhibition of strength and military dominance may help to keep others in line.  We must occasionally prove that we can “organize the greatest capacity for violence” in order to maintain our status as a world superpower (11).  I can appreciate the fact that we must carry a</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/2084084287075256467/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=2084084287075256467' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/2084084287075256467'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/2084084287075256467'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/04/incentives-of-war.html' title='The Incentives of War'/><author><name>Shay Callahan</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-1199325858686522409</id><published>2008-04-30T20:29:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2008-04-30T20:34:29.983-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Anarchy:  The Nonexistent State</title><summary type='text'>I’ve been considering Alex’s contention that Olson is wrong to simply assume banditry is to occur, or exists as some sort of necessary evil. At the time this argument was written off with the assurance that Olson understood the reality of the situation, which is that bandits will naturally crop up. However, in giving more thought to the idea I’ve realized Olson’s theories could well be applied to</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/1199325858686522409/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=1199325858686522409' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1199325858686522409'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/1199325858686522409'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/04/anarchy-nonexistent-state.html' title='Anarchy:  The Nonexistent State'/><author><name>Jaeson Madison</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='30' height='32' src='http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p285/ThaMadTown/1156366336_l.jpg'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-6535671171760197404</id><published>2008-04-30T16:11:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2008-04-30T16:19:22.999-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Legalize Marijuana</title><summary type='text'>In class a few weeks ago we discussed the importance to distinguish self enforcing purchases from the ones enforced by the government.  I think the main problem that lies with this is the illegal sector of the economy.  The "black market" has to be self enforcing because they cannot rely on the government to uphold a sale, as they are all illegal.  I think this fact has led to a lot of violence </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/6535671171760197404/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=6535671171760197404' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6535671171760197404'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6535671171760197404'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/04/legalize-marijuana.html' title='Legalize Marijuana'/><author><name>Luke Smith</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-7903307562887016378</id><published>2008-04-29T07:53:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2008-04-29T07:58:42.556-06:00</updated><title type='text'>A Question to Ask</title><summary type='text'>Last week I was talking to a colleague/friend and I asked him what he thought our government was for. His response, though I was a little surprised, seemed par for what I would assume most Americans think what our government is for- "I think the governments responsibility is to make us more well off, to better our lives". Maybe a good experiment for this weeks discussion would be for you to ask </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/7903307562887016378/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=7903307562887016378' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7903307562887016378'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/7903307562887016378'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/04/question-to-ask.html' title='A Question to Ask'/><author><name>Craig T Glackman</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-6823937918645867754</id><published>2008-04-28T22:03:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2008-04-28T22:20:38.992-06:00</updated><title type='text'>I Suppose it Only Takes One</title><summary type='text'>I have had this nagging question: in a nut shell, how can we trust the police? We have been discussing now for some time about how power comes about. My question has been if there was a revolution, per say, or a march on our Capital, what would keep the security (the ones with the power) from not joining the cause- what keeps a policeman loyal?This article is about how the police are essentially </summary><link rel='related' href='http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080429/wl_afp/mozambiquepolicerightsamnesty' title='I Suppose it Only Takes One'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/6823937918645867754/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=6823937918645867754' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6823937918645867754'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/6823937918645867754'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/04/i-suppose-it-only-takes-one.html' title='I Suppose it Only Takes One'/><author><name>Craig T Glackman</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-3461447365757542397</id><published>2008-04-28T21:40:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2008-04-28T21:51:33.536-06:00</updated><title type='text'>What Really Happens with Forecloseure</title><summary type='text'>I just skimmed an article that talked about why I should be concerned if my neighbors house forecloses. Though I just skimmed the article, the just was that when a house becomes foreclosed, there is a spike in crime and drugs in the neighborhood. I suppose this may be true for most, but I think it is a fallacy to generalize for all. Here is how I think it should be.Now, most of you know me by now</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/3461447365757542397/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=3461447365757542397' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/3461447365757542397'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/3461447365757542397'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/04/what-really-happens-with-forecloseure.html' title='What Really Happens with Forecloseure'/><author><name>Craig T Glackman</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-5212184058514995228</id><published>2008-04-27T16:59:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2008-04-27T17:00:29.009-06:00</updated><title type='text'>The Russian Oil Taxes…… Ouch!</title><summary type='text'>"It's never easy to find $1 trillion in investment capital, but the Russian government has made it hard for its oil industry to attract even a small part of that capital. The Kremlin has structured taxes so that most of the extraordinary rise in oil prices flows into government coffers, not oil-company profits.When oil rises above $27 a barrel, the Russian government takes 80% of any additional </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/5212184058514995228/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=5212184058514995228' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/5212184058514995228'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/5212184058514995228'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/04/russian-oil-taxes-ouch.html' title='The Russian Oil Taxes…… Ouch!'/><author><name>Robbe Uhrhammer</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11832158.post-2367170261763876057</id><published>2008-04-27T16:28:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2008-04-29T13:21:36.226-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Those Free Riding ______!</title><summary type='text'>During time in between classes last week we had a discussion about how America is always fighting wars somewhat alone. It seems as though there is not really all that much involvement in conflicts by other countries that are a part of the “functioning core” as Barnett calls them. We see that American forces are stepping in to conflicts but we don’t here too much of France, Germany, Spain or Italy</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/feeds/2367170261763876057/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11832158&amp;postID=2367170261763876057' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/2367170261763876057'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11832158/posts/default/2367170261763876057'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicaleconomygroup.blogspot.com/2008/04/those-free-riding-bstrds.html' title='Those Free Riding ______!'/><author><name>Robbe Uhrhammer</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
